Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces proximal balancing, a novel framework for causal effect estimation in the presence of unmeasured confounding by leveraging proxies. Unlike prior methods that rely on ill-posed inverse problems or restrictive latent variable assumptions, proximal balancing adapts covariate balancing principles to proxy-observed confounders by learning a low-dimensional summary that renders treatment groups comparable. The authors provide theoretical guarantees and a practical algorithm, PROBE, demonstrating its efficacy across various proxy types and real-world datasets.
Unmeasured confounders are no longer an insurmountable barrier to causal inference, thanks to a new method that balances treatment groups using proxy information without needing explicit proxy roles or latent variable models.
Estimating causal effects from observational data is central to science and policy, but the effects are not identified when confounders are unmeasured. Proximal causal inference addresses this problem with proxies of the unmeasured confounders. However, existing proxy-based approaches either designate proxy roles and solve an inverse problem, which is ill-posed and hard to estimate with high-dimensional proxies, or use a latent-variable model, which assumes that the learned latent variable matches the hidden confounder and leaves bias when it does not. To address these challenges, we introduce proximal balancing. It carries the classical idea of covariate balancing to confounders that are observed only through proxies: it learns a low-dimensional summary of the covariates and proxies that makes the treatment groups comparable, and then adjusts for this summary. It needs no designated proxy roles, inverse problem, or latent model. We give identification theory, finite-sample guarantees, and a practical algorithm, PROBE. We demonstrate the method on low-dimensional, high-dimensional, and image proxies and on real-world data.