Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the eternal connected vertex cover problem, establishing tight bounds and characterizations for graphs with minimum degree at least two. It proves that for such graphs, the eternal connected vertex cover number is at least $2|V(G)|-|E(G)|-1$, and equality holds if and only if vertices of degree at least three induce a forest. The work also demonstrates that for graphs in this class, the condition of every vertex belonging to some minimum connected vertex cover is not sufficient to guarantee $ecvc(G)=cvc(G)$, providing a counterexample.
A single vertex can be essential for maintaining connectivity, yet not guarantee an eternal connected vertex cover, revealing a subtle gap between static and dynamic graph defenses.
For a connected graph $G$ with at least one edge, the \textit{eternal connected vertex cover} number $ecvc(G)$ is the minimum number of guards that can maintain a connected vertex cover after every response to an arbitrary sequence of edge attacks. Denote the minimum size of a connected vertex cover by $cvc(G)$. It is known that $cvc(G)\leq ecvc(G)\leq cvc(G)+1$. A necessary condition for $ecvc(G)=cvc(G)$ is that every vertex belongs to some minimum connected vertex cover. We show that this condition is not sufficient: there exists a $32$-vertex graph $G$ that has $cvc(G)=19$ and $ecvc(G)=20$, although every vertex of $G$ belongs to some minimum connected vertex cover. For connected graphs with minimum degree at least two, we establish the sharp bound $cvc(G)\geq 2|V(G)|-|E(G)|-1$ and $\mathcal F$ denotes the class attaining equality. We prove that $G\in\mathcal F$ if and only if the vertices of degree at least three induce a forest. Within $\mathcal F$, the conditions $ecvc(G)=cvc(G)$, membership of every vertex in some minimum connected vertex cover, and the presence of at least two degree-two vertices on every cycle are equivalent. As applications, we obtain $ecvc(G)=cvc(G)$ for full subdivisions of connected graphs of minimum degree at least two and for minimally $2$-connected graphs. In both the families, every minimum connected vertex cover is an eternally winning configuration. This is not true in general for graphs outside $\mathcal{F}$, we show one example of such a graph.