Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors formulate an online filtering algorithm for parametric Hamiltonian PDEs that reconstructs unobserved state trajectories from sparse measurements by evolving low-dimensional symplectic approximation spaces alongside the underlying physical flow. Unlike classical data assimilation techniques that break geometric invariants and suffer from secular energy drift, this framework mathematically guarantees that state reconstructions retain symplectic structure and conserve energy up to approximation error. Backed by rigorous stability and best-approximation error bounds, the approach integrates a dynamic sensor-placement strategy that systematically outperforms static observation networks.
Standard data assimilation routinely breaks conservation laws, but evolving symplectic observation spaces alongside active sensor trajectories enables provably stable Hamiltonian PDE reconstruction with strict energy bounds.
While structure-preserving methods for the forward simulation of Hamiltonian systems are well established, the mathematical foundations of their data assimilation and filtering counterparts remain comparatively less developed, particularly regarding rigorous accuracy guarantees. To address this gap, we propose an online filtering algorithm to reconstruct an unknown function $u^\dagger$ from finitely many measurements, assuming that $u^\dagger$ solves a parametric Hamiltonian PDE with unknown inputs. The method uses low-dimensional symplectic approximation spaces that evolve in time according to the PDE model and informed by the measurement data. The method can also be coupled with a dynamical sensor-placement strategy designed to optimize reconstruction stability. We derive error bounds in terms of stability and best approximation, and show that the reconstruction remains in a symplectic space and preserves energy up to the approximation error. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the method and the benefits of dynamic over static sensor placement.