Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces NeuronDiscover, an Agent-in-Twin framework that addresses the confounding problem in mechanistic discovery by jointly reasoning over a mechanism and its computational twin. By coupling prediction, intervention proposals, and observation design within a shared World Action Model, it constructs a Mechanism--Intervention--Observation--Outcome (MIOY) graph to propose experiments that disentangle competing explanations. NeuronDiscover significantly outperforms baselines in resolving mechanistic relations in simulated and real neuronal data, demonstrating improved accuracy and reduced failure rates.
A single agent can disentangle true mechanisms from computational twin errors by jointly learning them, unlocking more accurate mechanistic discovery in complex biological systems.
Mechanistic discovery in neuronal microenvironments requires interventions and measurements that separate competing explanations of solute transport and neuronal response. Predictive accuracy cannot settle the question: a real mechanistic change and an error in the computational twin leave the same signature in sparse observations. We formalize this twin confounding and reason over a joint mechanism--discrepancy belief, designing experiments that separate the two. NeuronDiscover is an Agent-in-Twin framework whose shared, mechanism-grounded World Action Model (WAM) couples prediction, intervention proposals, and observation design; independently adjudicated outcomes revise a scoped Mechanism--Intervention--Observation--Outcome (MIOY) graph, whose supported relations compile into executable programs carrying discrepancy-adjusted acceptance bounds. We evaluate on simulated brain-fluid tracer-transport worlds adjudicated by an independently frozen finer-mesh reference solver, and on donor-disjoint public current-clamp recordings of cortical neurons. Counting only relations that reach a certified terminal status, and scoring abstentions as unresolved for every method, at a matched budget of 16 experiments over 32 source units NeuronDiscover resolves 4.0 relations per assigned world against 3.4 for the strongest baseline and 3.2 without graph revision, at 5% false support and 82% scope accuracy. Joint mechanism--discrepancy acquisition resolves 3.8 relations versus 2.9 for plug-in expected information gain; discrepancy-adjusted verification lowers accepted-program failure from 15% to 9% at 60% acceptance coverage; and transfer to the recordings yields 1.94 versus 1.53 relations per assigned world. Correctness is adjudicated within declared model worlds and archival recordings.