Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors investigate the de Rham cohomology of affine zero-dimensional schemes over characteristic-zero fields by analyzing the homology of the Kähler differential complex of their coordinate rings. Resolving when these cohomologies vanish is essential for characterizing non-reduced algebraic structures, such as fat points, which frequently arise in polynomial system solving and singularity theory. The key result provides an explicit vanishing criterion via Macaulay bases of exterior differential forms and proves that the cohomology of complete intersections can remain non-trivial unless their relation modules admit a standard basis.
Zero-dimensional schemes do not always possess trivial differential topology: non-reduced fat points can harbor rich, non-trivial de Rham cohomology that is governed strictly by the standard basis properties of their Kähler differential relations.
The (naive) de Rham cohomology of a zero-dimensional scheme is the homology of the Kähler differential algebra of its coordinate ring, viewed as a complex. Since it is well-known to vanish in higher degrees if the ring is quasi-homogeneous, we concentrate on the affine case. For a general affine $K$-algebra $R=P/I$, where ${\rm char}(K)=0$ and $P=K[x_1,\dots,x_n]$, we prove a vanishing theorem for $H_{\rm dR}^m(R)$ based on the shape of a Macaulay basis of $dI\wedge Ω^m_{P/K}$. For an Artinian local algebra $A=P/\langle f_1,\dots,f_n\rangle$, where $\{f_1,\dots,f_n\}$ is a super regular sequence, we show that $H_{\rm dR}^{\bullet}(A)$ is non-trivial in general, but trivial when the natural system of generators of the relation module of $Ω^m_{A/K}$ is a standard basis. Moreover, we provide a detailed study of the dimension of $H_{\rm dR}^0(A)=\ker(d_A)$ for Artinian local rings $A=P/I$. The case of arbitrary affine zero-dimensional schemes is reduced to this case using a Galois splitting, and as a result we obtain the de Rham cohomology of a fat point scheme. Many explicitly computed examples and counterexamples support the results and indicate how subtle the de Rham cohomology of a zero-dimensional scheme is in general.