Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors generalize flow matching beyond standard Gaussian optimal transport by constructing probability paths as geodesics on statistical manifolds of location-scale families. Standard Euclidean OT paths struggle to capture data with heavy tails, sharp contrasts, and severe inhomogeneities where probability-space geometry is non-Euclidean. Across synthetic benchmarks and multi-scale scientific datasets, this formulation outperforms or matches existing geometry-aware generative models in modeling complex, non-Gaussian distributions.
Flow matching's standard reliance on Euclidean Gaussian transport breaks down on heavy-tailed distributions—replacing these paths with statistical manifold geodesics over location-scale families directly resolves this representational bottleneck.
Flow matching (FM) has recently emerged as a promising framework for generative modeling due to its conceptual simplicity and strong empirical performance. In FM, samples are transported along a vector field parameterized by a neural network, inducing a probability path that evolves from a simple noise distribution to the target data distribution, governed by an ordinary differential equation (ODE). However, existing FM approaches predominantly rely on probability paths derived from optimal transport (OT) between Gaussian distributions, which may be suboptimal for capturing complex data with inhomogeneous structures such as heavy tail or sharp contrast. In this work, we generalize FM to the broader class of location-scale families for handling data inhomogeneity and introduce a novel class of probability paths defined as geodesics on the manifold of probability distributions. We name this approach probabilistic geodesic flow matching to distinguish it from prior geodesic (Riemannian) FM methods defined in input space. We argue that Euclidean OT-based paths are not necessarily optimal in probability space and may limit modeling flexibility. Through synthetic benchmarks and scientific datasets at different scales, we demonstrate that the proposed method more effectively captures complex distributions, leading to improved or comparable performance compared with SOTA geometry-motivated generative models.