Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This work investigates the semantic limits of large language models by critically evaluating the dual claims of the distributional hypothesis through ecological-enactivist cognitive theory and Quinean translation indeterminacy. The authors show that treating text statistics as the source of semantic meaning is a causal inversion, as distributional patterns merely reflect underlying agent-environment interactions rather than generating them. Crucially, the analysis reveals that high-fidelity translation requires only interlingual distributional correspondences and inferential structure, decoupling functional translation capability from genuine semantic grounding and reference.
LLMs can achieve near-flawless cross-lingual translation without comprehending a single concept, debunking the assumption that statistical mastery of text equates to genuine semantic understanding.
Large language models (LLMs) are commonly associated with the distributional hypothesis, according to which (1) semantic meaning is grounded in distributional patterns of linguistic context, and (2) knowledge of cross-linguistic distributional correspondences allows for successful translation. This paper rejects the first claim as a causal inversion: linguistic distributions reflect patterns arising from meaning-making practices rather than constituting their source. At the same time, it accepts the second claim, arguing that translation -human or machine - can succeed without requiring access to meaning or reference. Knowledge of interlingual distributional correspondence and their inferential organization may be sufficient for translation. The paper develops an ecological-enactivist perspective, according to which reference and meaning are grounded in agent-environment interaction and stabilized through action-grounded concepts, forms of world-involving cognition that current LLMs do not possess.