Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces Staged Linguistic Seeding (SLS) to enhance query expansion in AI contact centers by enriching a closed set of verified QA units with human-authored, world-grounded slot recipes transformed into variants by GPT-4.1-mini, filtered by human gatekeeping. The method achieves significant improvements in retrieval accuracy, with hybrid R@1 scores rising to 0.881 and 0.930 across two industrial domains, outperforming traditional methods like doc2query. Additionally, the approach minimizes unsupported content in responses, demonstrating a robust solution to the challenges of latency and accuracy in customer service AI applications.
Staged Linguistic Seeding boosts retrieval accuracy in AI contact centers, achieving R@1 scores above 0.930 while eliminating unsupported content in responses.
Customer-service QA in an AI contact center (AICC) runs under deployment constraints that benchmark QA misses: tight voice-hotline latency and a high cost for unsupported or wrong automatic answers. We deploy a system that answers only from a closed set of verified QA units: it returns a retrieved unit verbatim, or routes to clarify, abstain, or handoff. The index is enriched offline by staged linguistic seeding (SLS): a human authors a per-unit world-grounded slot recipe, gpt-4.1-mini renders it into variants, and a light human gate filters them. One methodology is reused across both domains, so inference stays a single retrieval pass with no query-time generation. On held-out query variants from two industrial domains, SLS lifts hybrid R@1 to 0.881/0.930 (+0.27/+0.34), with gains across all five retrievers tested. At the same gpt-4.1-mini generation budget, SLS beats doc2query by +0.20/+0.32, while cross-provenance evaluation provides additional evidence of transfer across generated-query distributions. Verified-unit answering also removes free-form generation's unsupported-content surface (7-13% versus approximately 0%). We report this as an application study, including negative results.