Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Agentic Empirical Asset Pricing (AEAP), a novel framework where LLM agents autonomously conduct the scientific discovery process for asset pricing. The authors establish a reference architecture and a rigorous evaluation standard for factor discovery, highlighting the inadequacies of traditional backtesting methods that focus solely on outputs rather than the discovery systems themselves. Through a comprehensive evaluation of SEADS against five baselines across two US equity panels, the study reveals that no single metric consistently ranks the systems, underscoring the need for multi-faceted evaluation approaches and exposing limitations in current methodologies.
Traditional asset pricing evaluations miss the mark by ignoring the reliability of the discovery process itself, revealing a critical gap in how we assess LLM-driven financial models.
Recent advances in LLM agents enable a new paradigm for asset pricing, which we call Agentic Empirical Asset Pricing (AEAP): systems that autonomously conduct the scientific discovery process itself. We define AEAP and identify its core building blocks. Existing evaluation practices backtest only the outputs (factors or trades), not the autonomous discovery system that produced them. We focus on factor discovery, contributing a reference architecture, a rigorous evaluation standard for discovered factors, and a method for out-of-sample backtesting the discovery system. As a concrete instance of that architecture, we evaluate SEADS against five re-implemented baselines on two US equity panels using this standard: no single metric ranks the systems consistently, motivating evaluation on multiple axes at once. A separate rolling re-execution then asks the complementary question of whether the discovery process itself, not one static output, is reliable. We also report negative findings and limitations that surface further evaluation pitfalls for future AEAP systems.