Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper establishes Spec-Driven Development (SDD) as a foundational discipline for Agentic Software Engineering (ASE), addressing the productivity paradox where individual gains in software development lead to team inefficiencies. Through a conceptual analysis of gray literature, the authors present a socio-technical model that redefines human-agent interactions and emphasizes specifications as contracts between humans and agents. Key findings include a typology of five interaction patterns and a distinction between technical and methodological harnesses that govern agent behavior, setting the stage for future empirical research in this emerging field.
SDD redefines accountability and verifiability in software engineering by establishing specifications as the new contract between humans and autonomous agents.
Context: Software engineering is moving from AI-assisted practices like vibe coding, in which assistants accelerate individual developers, towards Agentic Software Engineering (ASE), in which autonomous agents are delegated goal-level tasks. However, industry reports a productivity paradox: as individual productivity increases, team throughput, review capacity, and stability degrade because team-scale software engineering discipline is neglected. Objective: This paper aims to establish the conceptual and methodological foundations of Spec-Driven Development (SDD) as an enabling discipline for ASE at team scale and characterize the harness, i.e., the technical and methodological mechanisms through which teams govern agent behavior. Method: We conducted a conceptual analysis drawing predominantly on gray literature, including ASE vision and roadmap papers, practitioner reports, talks, and tooling, because peer-reviewed evidence and a shared academic-industrial vocabulary are not yet established. Results: Using a comparative characterization of the paradigm progression as conceptual framing, the article presents (i) a socio-technical model of SDD in which specifications act as the contract substrate between humans and agents; (ii) an operational characterization of the harness, distinguishing the technical harness around the agent from the methodological harness around the team, with worked examples; and (iii) a typology of five human--agent interaction patterns through which the human role is redefined. Conclusion: We conclude that SDD reconstitutes, in specification-centric form, the contracts that vibe coding dissolves: accountability, verifiability, and transferability. Given the immaturity of the evidence base, this work is presented as a first step toward academic-industrial consensus rather than a validated theory, and outlines a research agenda for future empirical validation.