Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a comprehensive workflow for creating physically consistent dynamic models of large real-world objects, addressing the challenge of limited fidelity in haptic interfaces due to the unavailability of such models. By employing a two-stage process that identifies the handle and body of objects without the need for torque sensors, the authors successfully model a heavy door and a wheelbarrow, demonstrating the effectiveness of their approach across different constraint types. The resulting models achieved low RMS errors in handle and body estimations, validating the accuracy of the proposed methodology for practical applications in haptic simulations.
Achieving under 0.64 N and 0.042 Nm RMS errors in handle estimation could revolutionize the accuracy of haptic feedback for everyday objects.
Simulation of admittance-type models requires physically consistent dynamic models that are rarely available for off-the-shelf, everyday objects, limiting the fidelity of haptic interfaces that rely on such simulations. This paper presents the first complete workflow for producing physically consistent models of large real-world objects with various constraints and mechanisms, guaranteeing physical consistency of inertia and friction parameters. The workflow separates each object and identifies the handle and body in two stages, requiring no torque sensors at hinges, axles, or other constrained joints. Models are produced for a heavy, closer-actuated door and a wheelbarrow, representing objects of differing constraint types and model complexity. The door is modeled using four-bar linkage kinematics and a fluid dynamics-based lumped parameter model including opening, backcheck, swing, and latch zones. The wheelbarrow is modeled as a rigid body with a spherical wheel and no slip during rolling. Handle estimation RMS errors were below 0.64 N and 0.042 Nm across both objects. Door body estimation had RMS error of 2.19 Nm and wheelbarrow body estimation had RMS error of 6.77 Nm.