Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Multimodal Large Language Models (MFAD) for face anti-spoofing detection, addressing critical limitations in existing systems such as poor generalization and reliance on low-quality datasets. By employing a fine-grained pixel-semantic anchoring mechanism, MFAD enhances the explainability and robustness of spoof detection, achieving a 40-50% reduction in in-domain Average Classification Error Rate (ACER) while maintaining cross-domain performance degradation below 12%. The approach not only demonstrates resilience against white-box adversarial attacks but also garners high reliability ratings from domain practitioners, indicating its potential for real-time deployment in biometric systems.
Achieving a 40-50% reduction in spoof detection errors while maintaining robustness against adversarial attacks, MFAD redefines the standards for explainable face anti-spoofing systems.
Facial biometric recognition systems currently face compound threats intertwining generative AI and high-fidelity physical spoofing. Existing defenses suffer from systemic bottlenecks, including poor generalization, non-auditable reasoning, and reliance on massive, low-quality datasets. To address these challenges, we propose Multimodal Large Language Models (MFAD) for face anti-spoofing detection, an explainable reasoning system for Unified Face Anti-Spoofing Detection (UFAD), accompanied by a semantic-level annotation benchmark. Unlike methods relying on external tools or coarse alignment, MFAD activates the intrinsic reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) via a fine-grained pixel-semantic anchoring mechanism. This eliminates localization hallucinations and ensures auditable reasoning paths. We introduce a cross-attack semantic-level unified annotation paradigm: by annotating only 1,000 precise masks per attack category, we generate reasoning evidence chains strictly corresponding to spoofed regions. Supervised fine-tuning on the Qwen-VL foundation model demonstrates that, using limited high-quality samples, the system achieves a 40-50% relative reduction in in-domain ACER and restricts cross-domain performance degradation to within 11.62%/5.23%, significantly outperforming existing frameworks. Furthermore, under white-box adversarial attacks, detection accuracy drops by only 3.2%, validating the robustness of semantic anchoring compared to models trained on massive short-text data. Domain practitioners rated the evidence reliability of reasoning paths at 4.57/5, with inference latency satisfying real-time deployment requirements. These results confirm that a few-shot, high-quality semantic annotation paradigm is effective for building trustworthy, explainable, and cost-efficient UFAD systems.