Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a reliability framework for soft piezoresistive strain sensors that integrates a physics-informed probabilistic inverse model with a risk factor to monitor sensor performance under uncertainty. By addressing the nonlinear and hysteretic nature of these sensors, the framework effectively identifies when sensors operate outside their calibrated workspace or exhibit internal failures. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves high fit scores (0.90-0.95) and successfully detects 95% of out-of-range conditions, enhancing the reliability of strain sensing in wearable and robotic applications.
A sensor that reports confidence alongside its estimate can prevent erroneous actions, effectively managing uncertainty without the need for labeled failure data.
Soft piezoresistive strain sensors are one of the most common sensing solutions for wearable and soft robotic applications due to their flexibility and compliance. However, their resistance response is nonlinear and hysteretic, and a sensor can be pushed past its calibrated workspace or misbehave inside it, carrying that error into a decision or control loop. Probabilistic regressors track confidence but ignore those limits. A predictive mean can look unremarkable even when the reading comes from a sensor outside its admissible range or already failing internally, so a confident-looking estimate is not the same as a trustworthy one. This paper proposes a reliability framework pairing a physics-informed probabilistic inverse model, built on physics-guided input features, with a risk factor fusing uncertainty with strain and strain-rate limits into a three-state monitor. Tests on a Nitinol wire and a silver-coated polyamide thread with a Gaussian Process raised fit scores to 0.90-0.95 (RMSE 0.26%-0.15%) and a 96% empirical coverage against the 95% target. The monitor caught 95% of out-of-range and 100% of abnormal conditions while staying reliable under nominal operation. A sensor that reports confidence alongside its estimate lets a system withhold action instead, since it needs no labeled failure examples, which are hard to collect for soft materials.