Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the foundational values that influence the adoption and rejection of foundation models in medical imaging, highlighting the normative dimensions that shape researchers' decisions. By employing a Socratic approach, the authors elucidate the justifications for both the utilization and avoidance of these models within the scientific literature and clinical practice. The findings reveal that understanding these values is crucial for comprehending the broader implications of technological choices in medical research and their impact on clinical outcomes.
Foundation models in medical imaging are not just technical tools; their adoption hinges on deeply rooted research values that shape clinical practices and outcomes.
Research values, properties with a distinctive normative dimension, often affect how technological research is performed in both direct and indirect ways by influencing how technical decisions are made. In machine learning for medical imaging, understanding these values can be important for understanding why particular researchers justify the decisions made in their publications and explain why certain technologies become ubiquitous (or not) in the scientific literature and in the clinic. This article explores one of these technologies, foundation models, finding detailed justifications both for their use and abstention from their use. By taking a Socratic approach to research values arising from this specific technical decision, this article aims to better illustrate how foundation models fit into the philosophy of machine learning in medicine.