Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how morphological diversity within machine collectives can enhance resilience to environmental changes, drawing parallels with biological organisms that adapt through diverse sensorimotor experiences. By tethering morphologically distinct agents, the researchers demonstrate that these connections allow for the management of disruptions, enabling the collective to maintain functionality in new environments without additional learning. The findings indicate that increasing the number and diversity of agents within a machine collective significantly boosts resilience, suggesting a novel approach to machine design inspired by biological principles.
Tethering diverse agents not only manages disruptions but also prepares machine collectives to thrive in unpredictable environments.
Organisms contain diverse, sensorimotor parts across size scales and rapidly adapt to new environments, while machines contain only inert materials at smaller scales and struggle with surprise. We hypothesize that this agents-within-agents quality of organisms may aid their resilience: increasing experiences with internal physical adversity may pre-train organisms and machines to handle external adversity, such as encounters with new environments. Not only has this hypothesis not yet been articulated, mechanisms enabling this phenomenon have yet to be proposed. Here we show a mechanism by which this can occur: we found that physical connectors, in learning to restore behavior to previously independent, morphologically diverse agents they disrupted by tethering them together, trigger and tame sufficiently diverse disruptions that later encounters with new environments trigger disruptions that fall within this manageable range, enabling the collective to continue behaving properly without any additional learning or adaptation. Further, we found that building collectives from more agents, or more diverse agents, further increases the collective's resilience to new environments. This suggests that not just taming but intentionally creating internal physical adversity may indeed prepare organisms for external adversity, and could do so for machines, if they were built from smaller machines.