Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of monitoring business conduct risk in environments with sparse and biased data by leveraging inter-firm relationships to enhance predictive accuracy. The authors introduce a visibility- and relation-aware GCNII framework that utilizes Positive-Unlabeled node classification on a corporate ownership graph, effectively identifying potential risks even among firms with limited incident records. Their approach outperforms both non-graph and simple graph-based benchmarks, highlighting the importance of relational structures in risk assessment and prioritization.
Inter-firm relationships can reveal hidden business conduct risks, even when incident data is sparse or biased.
The monitoring of business conduct risk is hindered by sparse, uneven, and visibility-biased data. Prior studies show that business conduct risk information and media coverage propagate through supply chain, peer, and corporate structure networks, yet incident records remain incomplete for many firms. As a result, the absence of reported events could reflect limited coverage rather than the absence of underlying business conduct risk. This paper examines whether inter-firm relationships can improve the prediction of future recorded conduct related incidents, particularly among firms with limited prior visibility. We formulate the task as Positive--Unlabeled node classification on a corporate ownership graph, where firms with recorded incidents are treated as labeled positives and firms without recorded incidents remain unlabeled. We then propose a visibility- and relation-aware GCNII framework that combines relation specific message passing with non-negative Positive--Unlabeled learning to account for positive contamination in the unlabeled set. In a forward-looking evaluation, the proposed approach achieved the strongest observed ranking performance relative to non-graph- and simple graph-based benchmarks. The results further show that graph-based inference retains its predictive value among firms without prior recorded incidents. These findings demonstrate the value of inter-firm relational structure as a complementary source of information for extending risk prioritization