Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores the impact of incorporating reasoning traces in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for Neural Machine Translation (NMT). By systematically omitting reasoning during training and inference, the authors demonstrate that including reasoning during inference significantly enhances translation quality, albeit at the cost of increased output tokens. The findings highlight a critical cost-quality tradeoff, suggesting that while reasoning improves performance, it also demands greater computational resources.
Including reasoning in NMT inference boosts translation quality but comes with a significant increase in computational cost.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been established as a viable paradigm for the post-training of Large Language Models (LLMs), including downstream tasks, such as Neural Machine Translation (NMT). With the latest research indicating that RLVR could be the preferred training method for translating legal documents due to the induced reasoning capabilities, it raises the question whether it is really attributed to the reasoning or more generally to the training paradigm. We investigate the importance of including the model's reasoning trace in the generated responses during both training and inference by systematically omitting it from one of the phases. Our experiments show that including the reasoning, specifically during inference, has a positive effect on the overall translation quality. Furthermore, we recognise that the reasoning leads to an increase in output tokens, hence we study the cost-quality tradeoff between the increased computational demands and the improved translation quality.