Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the reliance on spectral indices for predicting time-series data, arguing that the value of context—such as longer lookbacks and retrieval mechanisms—depends on the specific characteristics of the data rather than being universally applicable. The authors establish an impossibility result that shows spectral indices, which remain unchanged under phase randomization, fail to capture the additional predictive power provided by context. Through a novel diagnostic called the coverage deficit, they demonstrate that while spectral indices remain stable, the effectiveness of context-based methods varies significantly across different datasets, revealing critical insights into their predictive capabilities.
Contextual enhancements in time-series forecasting can drastically shift predictive performance, with retrieval methods showing a staggering drop in value across different data structures.
A growing family of indices scores how predictable a series is from its spectrum. Practitioners increasingly read these scores as answering a different question: whether \emph{adding context}, a longer lookback, a retrieval plug-in, or a pretrained model, will help. These are not the same question. The value of context is a property of the operating point, not of the series. Any index built from the power spectrum is invariant under phase randomization, whereas the beyond-second-order value that retrieval and foundation models supply is not, because a phase-randomized series is asymptotically Gaussian. We state this as an impossibility result and isolate it with surrogate pairs that fix the spectrum and the marginal by construction. We then give a label-free, configuration-level diagnostic, the coverage deficit, whose principal term measures beyond-spectrum structure as the gain of analog over linear prediction. On seven benchmarks the prediction holds: window-keyed retrieval's value collapses across surrogate pairs (ECL median $+33\%\!\to\!-35\%$, $p{<}10^{-40}$) while every spectral index stays frozen; a foundation model's value splits into a surviving second-order part and a small beyond-linear margin that collapses; a longer linear window's value survives. Leave-one-dataset-out, the structure term predicts the sign of beyond-spectrum value where the spectral indices trail it, and the reverse holds for the second-order mechanism. We introduce no new forecaster; the contribution is the distinction, a controlled comparison, and a diagnostic for the deployment decision. Code: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SINE.