Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the ethical implications of deploying opaque AI-enabled systems, emphasizing the importance of practical judgment, virtue, and intuition in mitigating concerns related to their autonomy and reliability. By advocating for a human-centric approach that acknowledges non-quantifiable positive traits, the authors argue for the development of training regimens and guidelines that align AI deployment with ethical and legal norms. The military domain serves as a key example, illustrating how these human capabilities can enhance decision-making in contexts where transparency is lacking.
Relying solely on opaque AI systems could undermine ethical decision-making, but integrating human virtues can bridge the gap between autonomy and accountability.
AI-enabled systems are seeing increasing deployment across numerous domains, with many being"black boxes"with respect to core functions and capabilities. I.e., many systems take inputs and give outputs, but without users having any ability to see how the former lead to the latter. AI-enabled systems are also being used to augment autonomy in systems, and autonomy coupled with opacity raises numerous concerns surrounding, e.g., the reliability of systems, their regularity in functioning, human ability to control them, or whether deploying opaque and potentially autonomous systems is in compliance with ethical and legal norms. In this article, we argue that many of these worries can be mitigated by leveraging practical judgment, virtue, and intuition in the deployment and use of opaque AI-enabled systems. We show that focusing on these distinctly human capabilities provides a means for bridging between the practical challenges created by opacity and the ethical, legal, and social norms underpinning particular domains. We argue that a core element in doing this is a recognition that many positive human traits are not quantifiable and we therefore must develop training regimen and guidelines on AI deployment anchored in humanistic but non-quantifiable values. Throughout the article, we focus on the military domain as an exemplar of the importance of practical judgment, virtue, and intuition as drivers for ethical and effective human decision-making surrounding AI deployments, but the underlying arguments apply to all domains where opaque and potentially autonomous systems are being deployed (subject to domain-specific alterations).