Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper models intercomprehension—the ability to understand a related language—through a Bayesian framework that employs a language model (LM) for scoring latent hypotheses about translations. By integrating a general-purpose noise model, the authors infer mappings between words in different languages based on form-based similarities or symbolic rules. The results from a human behavioral experiment demonstrate that their model aligns more closely with actual human intercomprehension performance than simpler ablations or larger models using zero-shot prompting, underscoring the cognitive plausibility of their approach.
Human-like intercomprehension can be effectively modeled as probabilistic inference, outperforming larger models in zero-shot scenarios.
Intercomprehension refers to partial intelligibility of an unfamiliar language (L2) by a speaker of a related language (L1). How is this zero-shot cross-language comprehension possible? In this work, we extend past work on algorithmic models of noisy-channel inference to model intercomprehension in a Bayesian framework. The model uses an LM in L1 only for scoring latent hypotheses about the translations of observed L2 utterances, and a general-purpose noise model to infer a mapping between L2 and L1 words based on either form-based similarity or symbolic rules. We then conduct a human behavioral experiment, eliciting inferences for utterances in Dutch, Italian, and Ukrainian from speakers of English, Spanish, and Russian, respectively. Our full model shows a closer alignment to the distribution of human intercomprehension performance than ablations, and also compares favorably to zero-shot prompting of much larger models. These results provide a cognitively plausible computational model of intercomprehension, and highlight the flexible inferences made by comprehenders under wide uncertainty in real-world cross-language scenarios. We share our code publicly.