Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how memory characteristics influence the emergence and evolution of shared meaning in a non-partnership coordination game. By simulating agents with varying levels of adaptiveness and memory degradation, the authors reveal that adaptive players achieve actual conceptual convergence more rapidly and maintain closer final conceptual regions compared to their non-adaptive counterparts, who perceive convergence sooner but fail to achieve it effectively. The findings underscore the significance of memory dynamics in shaping both actual and perceived conceptual alignment among agents.
Adaptive memory strategies lead to faster and more accurate convergence on shared meanings, while non-adaptive agents misjudge their progress.
Shared meaning in language requires people to learn and agree on categories. We ask how characteristics of agents'memories change the emergence and evolution of shared meaning. Without a coordination game, models of conceptual semantics cannot explain how shared meaning emerges and changes in groups of people; however, existing games assume that players share payoffs in a partnership setting. We model conceptual alignment as a non-partnership game and illustrate differences in actual and perceived conceptual convergence from counterfactual simulations using agents with varying levels of adaptiveness and memory degradation. We found that adaptive players achieved actual convergence faster and had closer final conceptual regions than non-adaptive players, while non-adaptive players perceived convergence earlier. Weighing novel information less over time resulted in more stable agreements than fixing the weight of novel information. Memory features are critical to the emergence and evolution of actual and perceived convergence.