Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a game-theoretic framework for auditing black-box conditional quantile forecasters, addressing the limitations of traditional calibration methods that fail to account for varying information sets available to auditors. The authors establish that the coarseness of the auditor's information significantly impacts the difficulty of the testing problem and derive finite-time detection guarantees for miscalibration based on contextual features. Empirical validation reveals that the widely-used Chronos-2 forecaster exhibits significant miscalibration when evaluated against multiple relevant features, highlighting the framework's practical implications.
Auditors can now detect miscalibration in conditional quantile forecasters with a feature-aware approach, revealing that even popular models like Chronos-2 may be significantly flawed.
Black-box conditional quantile forecasts are widely used for sequential decisions under asymmetric costs, such as inventory planning in supply chain management. Once deployed, such forecasters must be monitored continuously as data streams drift and regimes change; this invalidates standard, fixed-horizon backtests for calibration. Further, existing backtests do not take into account that the notion of calibration is, in fact, information-dependent: forecasts can look calibrated to an auditor with coarse information while being miscalibrated to an auditor with richer information. We develop a distribution-free and game-theoretic testing framework for continuously auditing black-box conditional quantile forecasters with non-i.i.d. losses, such that the resulting evidence process is powerful against predictably chosen alternatives specified by the features available to the auditor. We first formalize notions of conditional quantile calibration when different sets of features are available to the auditor, establishing that the coarseness of the auditor's information set determines the hardness of the testing problem. We then identify the sets of alternatives for which the auditor can achieve power, and focusing on contextual bets linear in the features, we derive finite-time detection guarantees for such alternatives, all without an i.i.d. assumption. The resulting evidence processes are interpretable at the feature level, as they quantify fine-grained, "feature-aware" evidence for miscalibration. We empirically validate these methods on simulated and real data, finding that a popular time series forecaster (Chronos-2) is highly miscalibrated w.r.t. multiple relevant features.