Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the non-monotonic behavior of thermal conductivity in lithium-ion electrodes during the calendering process, revealing a U-shaped response in graphite-based anodes. By extending the Zehner–Bauer–Schlunder model to account for calendering effects, the researchers demonstrate that initial decreases in thermal conductivity due to reduced porosity can be offset by increased particle contact at higher compaction levels. The proposed model significantly improves predictive accuracy, reducing the mean absolute percentage error from 31.1% to 4.5% across various calendering states and electrode types.
A novel model reveals that calendering can initially hinder thermal conductivity in lithium-ion electrodes before enhancing it, challenging conventional understanding of electrode performance.
Calendering is a key manufacturing step in lithium-ion electrode production, increasing volumetric energy density by reducing electrode porosity. Its effect on through-plane effective thermal conductivity, however, can be non-monotonic: measurements of graphite-based anodes show an initial decrease in thermal conductivity during early calendering followed by recovery at higher compaction. Conventional porosity-based effective-medium closures cannot reproduce this U-shaped behaviour. We develop a calendering-aware extension of the Zehner--Bauer--Schl\"under model that combines a Knudsen-corrected porous-medium baseline with a compression-indexed contact contribution. For graphite electrodes, the model represents the competing effects of increasing particle contact and calendering-induced reorientation of anisotropic graphite particles, which initially reduces favourable through-plane heat-transport pathways. For quasi-isotropic NMC cathodes, the observed response is instead captured through process-dependent contact-network evolution. Across 27 calendering states spanning thin and thick graphite anodes and NMC622 and NMC811 cathodes, the proposed closure reduces the mean absolute percentage error from 31.1% for the zero-fit reference model to 4.5%. The result shows that incorporating process-dependent microstructural evolution is necessary to capture the measured conductivity minimum. Validation across additional electrode formulations, thicknesses, and chemistries remains necessary to assess transferability.