Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a systematic API audit of four LLMs used as history tutors, analyzing 1,800 responses related to the 1989 Romanian Revolution across diverse student personas. It reveals four patterns of epistemic paternalism that disadvantage marginalized students, including a 76.7% refusal rate of educational requests from low-tier students and a threefold reduction in access to complex geopolitical discussions. The findings highlight how safety-aligned models inadvertently perpetuate systemic inequalities, transforming AI into tools of narrative segregation and hermeneutical injustice.
Safety-aligned LLMs block nearly 77% of educational requests from low-tier students, entrenching systemic inequalities in history education.
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as conversational tutors, they risk institutionalizing systemic inequalities. This study presents a systematic API audit of four LLMs acting as history tutors, evaluating 1,800 responses regarding the 1989 Romanian Revolution across five student personas varying by ethnicity and socio-economic tier. We uncover four interconnected patterns of \emph{epistemic paternalism}: (1)~\textbf{Differential Refusal}, where safety-aligned models block 76.7\% of educational requests from low-tier students; (2)~\textbf{Epistemic Gatekeeping}, evidenced by a 3$\times$ reduction in access to geopolitical complexity (e.g., the contested ``coup theory'') for marginalized learners; (3)~\textbf{Agency Theft}, a lexical shift where models like LLaMA produce a 5$\times$ higher victimization-to-politics vocabulary ratio for Roma students compared to elite peers; and (4)~\textbf{Elite Hermeneutics}, where AI tutors disproportionately withhold epistemic confidence and justification scores from low-resource demographic profiles. We argue that current safety alignment acts as a paternalistic filter, transforming conversational AI into agents of narrative segregation -- a manifestation of \emph{hermeneutical injustice} in Fricker's~\cite{fricker2007} sense that demands urgent pedagogical auditing.