Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the binary approach of allowing or banning AI in education, arguing instead for a nuanced design framework that emphasizes the placement of AI tools in the learning process. The authors present strong causal evidence showing that poorly designed AI can hinder learning outcomes, while well-structured AI interventions can significantly enhance student performance. They propose a six-move instructional model that guides educators in effectively integrating AI to support productive struggle and genuine mastery in learning tasks.
AI can either hinder or enhance learning, depending on its placement in the educational process—get it wrong, and students can perform 17% worse on exams.
With AI advancing fast, educators face a dilemma: allow the tool or ban it. Conflicting evidence that it both helps and hurts learning only deepens the confusion. The allow-or-ban framing is a false dichotomy; the relevant design question is placement. Used well, AI can scale feedback, examples, practice, and individualized support. Used poorly, it replaces the cognitive work that learning requires and leaves an illusion of learning: a confident sense of mastery that collapses on the unaided task. The strongest causal evidence shows the outcome flips on design: an unguarded AI helper left high-school students about 17% worse on an unaided exam than peers with no tool at all, while the same model rebuilt to withhold answers erased the harm, and a well-engineered tutor roughly doubled learning. We give educators one graspable frame for placing the tool. A new idea is learned through six moves, in order: Prime, Probe, Point, Attach, Strengthen, and Test. Secure the first hard attempt and the final unaided check, scaffold with guarded AI in between, and one diagnostic carries the frame: if letting AI in makes the task feel effortless, it is in the wrong place. To make it usable, we map classical teaching moves and AI-supported interventions to each step. Together, the six-move model, the placement rule, and the intervention menu provide a practical foundation for lesson and course redesign in the age of AI.