Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the TikTok trend of AI-generated first-person historical narratives, employing a two-stage empirical approach that includes an exploratory pilot study and a larger-scale analysis using data from the TikTok Research API. The findings reveal a prevalence of emotionally charged contemporary history topics, alongside notable historical inaccuracies, particularly in captions. A comparative analysis of audience responses to videos on the Black Death and Holocaust indicates that topic selection significantly influences engagement, with Holocaust-related content eliciting higher levels of hate speech and disinformation.
Audience reactions to AI-generated historical narratives on TikTok reveal that emotionally charged topics can amplify hate speech and misinformation, particularly in sensitive contexts like the Holocaust.
This paper examines the history POV trend on TikTok, in which AI-generated first-person scenes depict historical events. We use a two-stage empirical approach: an exploratory pilot study and a larger-scale study building up on a dataset obtained through the TikTok Research API. In both studies we analyze the themes of the trend and how the audience responds in the comments. Findings show a dominance of emotionally charged contemporary history topics, with historical inaccuracies visible at the caption level. A comparative comment analysis of Black Death and Holocaust videos, combining manual annotation with DistilBERT-based classification, reveals that topic choice shapes audience response, with Holocaust content attracting disproportionately higher rates of hate speech and disinformation. The paper also reflects on the strengths and limitations of API-based research for studying fast-moving platform trends.