Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the inadequacies of existing legal frameworks like the EU Digital Rights and GDPR in addressing the power imbalances created by data monopolies, which exploit personal data while leaving algorithmic inferences unregulated. By employing critical posthumanism and analyzing four sectors—entertainment, e-commerce, fintech, and telematics—it reveals how data siloing leads to cognitive amputation and ontological violence against individuals. The authors advocate for a shift towards a decolonial infrastructure that ensures the functional transferability of algorithmic identities, thereby empowering individuals to reclaim their digital selves.
Current data regulations fail to protect us from the cognitive amputation and ontological violence inflicted by monopolistic data practices.
As Ambient Intelligence weaves computing into everyday life, human existence has become inextricably linked to ubiquitous digital infrastructures, triggering a crisis of personal data sovereignty. Driven by extractivism and data colonialism, platforms exploit human experience as a terra nullius, enclosing proprietary user models within isolated silos. We argue that legal frameworks like the EU Digital Rights and GDPR fail to counter this power asymmetry because they regulate inert raw data while leaving monopolies over algorithmic inferences unchallenged. Consequently, current architectures act as funhouse mirrors, creating a grotesque, distorted depiction of our digital selves. Through critical posthumanism and four contemporary scenarios (entertainment, e-commerce, fintech, and telematics), this paper illustrates how data siloing inflicts cognitive amputation, ontological violence, and self-censorship. We argue that securing digital rights requires moving beyond defensive regulation toward a decolonial infrastructure that guarantees the functional transferability of algorithmic identities, reclaiming technology for the emancipation of the posthuman self.