Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces LoSoNA, a benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LLM-based agents to recognize and adapt to local social norms in multi-party chat scenarios. By presenting models with curated group-chat transcripts that demonstrate hidden norms, the study assesses how well these models can infer and apply these norms in their responses. Results indicate that while naive prompting is largely ineffective, explicit norm-aware prompting significantly enhances performance, with Gemini 3.1 Pro achieving 84.2% accuracy in norm inference.
LLMs struggle to adapt to local social norms in group chats, but explicit prompting can boost performance, with top models reaching over 80% accuracy.
Online group chats are social spaces with local conversational norms that are rarely stated explicitly. The ability and willingness of LLM-based agents to recognize and adapt to these norms remains mostly unexplored. We introduce LoSoNA, a benchmark for local social norm adaptation in multi-party chat. Each scenario gives a subject model a curated group-chat transcript in which non-subject participants demonstrate a hidden local norm, followed by a final elicitor turn that forces a response revealing whether the subject has inferred that norm. We evaluate eight frontier and open-weight models under four prompting conditions that vary how explicitly the model is told to treat the prior conversation as evidence for how it should answer. Naive prompting remains limited for most models; explicit norm-aware prompting helps unevenly, with Gemini 3.1 Pro reaching 84.2% and Claude Fable 5 reaching 81.6%, while several other models show small gains or regressions. LoSoNA contributes to recent calls for evaluating LLM social capabilities by testing whether models can infer local conversational norms from precedent and use them in a one-turn group-chat response.