Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critically examines the legal and ethical implications of AI voice cloning technologies, particularly in light of recent controversies surrounding the replication of celebrity voices. It highlights how generative AI threatens the unique value of vocal identity and complicates existing legal frameworks, including the right of publicity, personality rights, and personal data protection. The comparative analysis reveals the strengths and limitations of these frameworks in addressing the challenges posed by AI-generated voice cloning, providing a foundational understanding for future legal considerations in this domain.
AI voice cloning technologies are not just a technical marvel; they pose profound legal dilemmas that challenge our understanding of personal identity and rights.
The advent of sophisticated AI-driven voice cloning has brought to the fore critical legal and ethical challenges regarding the protection of vocal identity. Prompted by recent controversies—including the striking resemblance between OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4o voice and that of Scarlett Johansson—this article examines how generative AI technologies undermine the unique value of the human voice and further complicate the legal questions surrounding personal identity. Through a comparative analysis, the paper evaluates three principal legal frameworks: the right of publicity, personality rights, and the personal data protection right. Each framework—rooted in different legal traditions—offers distinct strengths and limitations in addressing the threats posed by AI-generated voice cloning. By analysing these doctrines’ scope, remedies, and posthumous protections, the study offers a foundation for understanding how existing legal approaches may be applied to the evolving challenges of vocal identity in the era of generative AI.