Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper enhances the Marine Robotics Unity Simulator (MARUS) by establishing a standardized Virtual Sea Trial framework that automates the execution and data generation of Turning Circle (TC) and Zig-Zag (ZZ) manoeuvres for Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs). The framework features traceable command-actuation logging and a dedicated data acquisition pipeline that ensures the generated datasets are compliant with IMO and ITTC standards, thus improving the repeatability and auditability of manoeuvre assessments. Case studies reveal that the simulator achieves high fidelity in manoeuvre behavior, with compliance metrics meeting international criteria for hydrodynamic derivative identification.
A new virtual sea trial framework enables automated, compliant manoeuvre assessments for USVs, ensuring high fidelity and traceability in hydrodynamic data generation.
Accurate identification of hydrodynamic derivatives is essential for control and navigation of Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs), but high-fidelity manoeuvring data from physical sea trials are constrained by cost and safety. Turning Circle (TC) and Zig-Zag (ZZ) trials remain fundamental to IMO and ITTC assessment procedures. This paper extends the Marine Robotics Unity Simulator (MARUS) by introducing a standardised Virtual Sea Trial framework for automated execution and data generation of TC/ZZ manoeuvres, with traceable command-actuation logging, system-identification (SI)-focused data conditioning, and automated extraction of IMO/ITTC-aligned manoeuvring metrics. A key contribution is a dedicated TC/ZZ data acquisition and post-processing pipeline, improving the repeatability and auditability of simulator-based manoeuvres while producing SI-ready datasets for hydrodynamic-derivative identification and digital-twin workflows. Another feature is explicit command-execution separation for differential-thrust steering, where inputs are recorded as ordered rudder-equivalent commands and realised actuation is logged as an execution-level proxy derived from applied thrust. Case-study results demonstrate repeatable and compliant manoeuvre behaviour. For TC tests, the normalised advance differs by approximately 3.9 percent between port and starboard sides, while the tactical diameter differs by approximately 4.6 to 4.7 percent. For ZZ tests, first and second overshoot excesses remain below 1 degree for both +/- 10 degree and +/- 20 degree manoeuvres, satisfying IMO criteria, while peak yaw rates range from approximately 4.1 to 5.8 deg/s. Overall, the framework provides a repeatable and auditable virtual sea-trial workflow for generating IMO/ITTC-aligned datasets and supporting system identification, hydrodynamic-derivative estimation, and digital-twin calibration.