Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the issue of error compounding in modular neural networks by introducing energy conservation as a hard constraint on information flow between modules. By enforcing the preservation of activation energy at module boundaries, the authors demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy across various noise conditions, achieving 77.4% clean accuracy at noise sigma=0.2 compared to much lower performance from baseline and energy-penalized models. The approach not only enhances performance in depth-invariant scenarios but also generalizes well to different types of noise, showcasing its robustness and practical applicability in real-world settings like robotic pipelines.
Enforcing energy conservation in neural networks can dramatically improve accuracy and robustness against noise, outperforming traditional methods by substantial margins.
Modular neural network pipelines suffer from error compounding: noise at any module boundary propagates and potentially amplifies through subsequent modules. We introduce energy conservation as a hard physical constraint on inter-module information flow. Activation energy (the squared L2 norm of feature vectors) is enforced to be exactly preserved at every module boundary. Unlike soft energy penalties, conservation is an inviolable law: the network may redistribute energy across neurons but cannot create or destroy it. Four experiments on CIFAR-10 demonstrate: (1) conservation retains 77.4% of clean accuracy at noise sigma=0.2, versus 35.1% for baselines and 30.9% for energy-penalized models (p<0.001, 5 seeds); (2) pipelines become depth-invariant, retaining 93.3% at depths 2 through 5 with noise at every boundary; (3) the advantage generalizes to systematic bias (+45.1%), Gaussian (+40.4%), and adversarial noise (+4.8%), with a principled non-effect on dropout (-0.3%); (4) on ResNet-18, the conservation advantage scales inversely with intrinsic normalization: +0.3 pp with BatchNorm, +26.2 pp without at sigma=0.2, reaching +58.0 pp at sigma=0.5. Experiment 5 validates the operator on a real modular robotic pipeline (MuJoCo physics, Franka Panda). Across three independent runs on separate machines (90 trials per cell), conservation provides +18.9 pp average advantage on monocular-depth-style noise. A formal bound proves conserved noise energy is strictly less than input noise energy.