Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The study introduces IMPACT-DoseAcc, an uncertainty-aware framework for dose accumulation in adaptive radiotherapy, specifically applied to CBCT-guided treatment for cervical cancer. By leveraging two deformation image registration (DIR) uncertainty strategies—Bayesian segmentation and ensemble modeling—the framework quantifies anatomical uncertainties and generates probabilistic dose-volume histograms. Results indicate strong correlations between ensemble DIR uncertainty and geometric error, with the framework achieving high coverage rates for clinical target volumes, thereby enhancing the reliability of cumulative dose estimations in the presence of anatomical variations.
Uncertainty in dose accumulation can be quantified and managed, leading to more reliable treatment plans in adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Background and purpose: oART enables daily plan adaptation to interfraction anatomical variations, but cumulative dose estimation remains limited by DIR, segmentation, and anatomical uncertainties. We introduce IMPACT-DoseAcc, an uncertainty-aware dose accumulation framework, within IMPACT for semantic feature-driven image analysis. The framework is modality- and disease-agnostic and is applied to CBCT-guided oART for cervical cancer (LACC). Material and Methods: Nine LACC patients were retrospectively analyzed using daily CBCT-derived virtual CTs for dose recalculation. IMPACT-DoseAcc focuses on uncertainty from DIR, without modeling vCT-generation uncertainty. Two DIR uncertainty strategies were tested within IMPACT-Reg: a Bayesian segmentation-guided approach using one probabilistic model to quantify anatomical uncertainty, and an ensemble of segmentation models targeting structures to capture epistemic variability. Voxel-wise uncertainty maps were propagated through dose warping and accumulation to generate probabilistic dose-volume histograms. Ensemble uncertainty was quantified from voxel-wise standard deviation across deformation fields, and geometric error was assessed using surface distance between warped and validated contours. Anatomical-variability weighting refined aggregation. Results: Ensemble DIR uncertainty correlated with geometric error, with Pearson coefficients of 0.63 for CTVt and 0.66 for bladder. For CTVt, pDVHs achieved 96.3 +/- 3.9% coverage, showing calibration of propagated uncertainty. Weighting stabilized estimates across fractions and organs. Conclusions: IMPACT-DoseAcc propagates registration-driven uncertainty to cumulative dose metrics, improving interpretation of accumulated dose under anatomical variations. Its 3DSlicer integration supports reproducible, uncertainty-informed ART workflows.