Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper advocates for logical pluralism in formalised reasoning by leveraging shallow embeddings of non-classical logics within classical higher-order logic (HOL). It argues that a unifying meta-logical framework like LogiKEy, which supports multiple object-logics, is crucial for interdisciplinary knowledge reuse. The authors caution against "logical imperialism," where a single foundational logic restricts the flexibility and applicability of large-scale theory developments.
Stop forcing all your reasoning problems into one logical box: embracing logical pluralism unlocks interdisciplinary knowledge reuse and avoids the limitations of "logical imperialism."
This position statement looks back on two decades of work on shallow embeddings of non-classical logics in classical higher-order logic (HOL), a line of research that expanded into a range of logic embeddings in HOL and inspired the LogiKEy logic-pluralistic knowledge representation and reasoning methodology. This paper advances the case for logical pluralism at object-logic level within a unifying meta-logical framework such as LogiKEy, grounding the argument in computational metaphysics. More broadly, it advocates principled support for logical pluralism in modern proof assistants, and cautions against logical imperialism -- the rigid adoption of a single foundational logic for large-scale theory developments -- which impedes the interdisciplinary reuse that LogiKEy is designed to enable.