Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces DEI, a distributed Quality-Diversity search framework that leverages heterogeneous large language models (LLMs) as mutation operators, enhancing behavioral novelty through diverse inductive biases. By implementing non-blocking collective operations, DEI allows for the sharing of local optimal solutions across nodes, fostering cross-model adversarial pressure that improves robustness beyond traditional self-play methods. Evaluated on the Core War domain, DEI achieved a 124% increase in merged-archive QD-Score and 28% higher coverage compared to a single-node baseline, underscoring the importance of model diversity in distributed LLM-based QD search.
Model diversity, rather than mere parallelism, drives significant gains in Quality-Diversity search performance, as evidenced by a 124% boost in QD-Score.
We present DEI: Diversity in Evolutionary Inference, a distributed Quality-Diversity (QD) search framework that assigns heterogeneous large language models (LLMs) as mutation operators across peer nodes communicating with non-blocking collective operations. Unlike homogeneous parallel search, which replicates a single model's inductive biases across all workers, DEI treats each LLM's distinct creative prior as a complementary source of behavioral novelty. Extending the Digital Red Queen framework with DEI, nodes share local optimal solutions at the end of each round to seed the next round's population. This creates cross-model adversarial pressure that drives robustness beyond intra-model self-play. Evaluated on the Core War domain, a competitive programming benchmark in which Redcode warrior programs battle inside a simulated machine, a four-node heterogeneous ensemble (GPT-5.4-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.2, and Claude Haiku 4.5) achieves 124 percent higher merged-archive QD-Score (45.90 vs. 20.46) and 28 percent higher coverage (80.6 percent vs. 63.0 percent of cells) than a single-node baseline at equal total LLM-call budget. The heterogeneous ensemble also outperforms an equally-budgeted homogeneous ensemble on QD-Score, coverage, and held-out solution generality across all four model families. These results provide the first empirical evidence that model diversity, not merely parallelism, is the key driver of gain in distributed LLM-based QD search.