Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the first transformer-based dementia detection system for Filipino speech, addressing a critical gap in NLP for low-resource, code-switching languages. They created a parallel bilingual (Filipino-English) dataset of 4,000 DementiaBank-derived transcripts to isolate language effects from domain effects. Results show that bilingual fine-tuning of transformer models eliminates cross-lingual performance degradation, achieving Macro-F1 scores of 0.969-0.973, suggesting linguistic coverage is more important than model scale/architecture.
Training on more languages, not bigger models, is the key to robust clinical NLP, as demonstrated by near-perfect dementia detection in Filipino speech after bilingual fine-tuning.
Dementia detection from spontaneous speech offers a scalable approach to cognitive screening, yet NLP systems remain predominantly English-centric. This limitation is especially acute in the Philippines, where Filipino-English code-switching is pervasive and no prior work has addressed NLP-based dementia detection. We present the first systematic evaluation of transformer-based dementia detection in Filipino speech and the first assessment of NeoBERT in a clinical NLP setting. To separate language from domain effects, we construct a parallel bilingual dataset of 4,000 DementiaBank-derived transcripts, with Filipino translations produced manually to preserve discourse-level markers of cognitive decline. We evaluate five model families, TF-IDF + LogReg, BERT, NeoBERT, XLM-R, and RoBERTa-Tagalog, under monolingual, zero-shot cross-lingual, and bilingual fine-tuning settings. We find that in-domain performance does not transfer across languages, with English-trained BERT dropping to Macro-F1 = 0.455 on Filipino, and that architectural modernization alone does not improve robustness. Bilingual fine-tuning, however, eliminates cross-lingual degradation across all transformer models, converging to Macro-F1 = 0.969-0.973. These results suggest that multilingual clinical NLP performance is driven primarily by linguistic coverage during training rather than model scale or architecture.