Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates how translators' work, captured in translation memories (TM) and parallel corpora, has become crucial training data for machine translation (MT) models, including LLMs. It argues that translators are effectively "invisible teachers" of AI, as their work is used to train models without proper recognition or compensation. The paper analyzes the legal frameworks in Japan, Europe, and the US, highlighting how copyright laws often fail to protect translators' rights in the context of AI training data.
The AI revolution is built on the backs of translators, whose labor fuels machine learning without recognition or fair compensation.
This paper examines how the labour of translators has been transformed into foundational data capital for the age of artificial intelligence (AI). Translation memories (TM) and parallel corpora preserve a one-to-one correspondence between source and target text and therefore constitute extraordinarily valuable supervised training data for machine translation. The development of statistical machine translation (SMT), neural machine translation (NMT), the Transformer architecture, and multilingual large language models (LLMs) cannot be disentangled from the accumulation of such translation data. And yet, translators' renditions have been bought as deliverables under contract, segmented as technical objects, and processed as "information analysis" data under copyright law -- losing their moral, creative, and economic attribution to the translators who produced them. The paper develops two concepts to capture this process. The first is appropriation without consumption: a mode of use in which works are not read, viewed, or listened to, but only mined for statistical features -- a use that is legitimated under Article 30-4 of the Japanese Copyright Act. The second is the invisible teacherisation of translators: the process by which translators, through the construction of translation memories, post-editing, and quality assessment, have functioned as teachers of AI without recognition as such. Drawing on the data supply chain that runs from translators through language service providers (LSPs) and platforms to model developers, on a comparative reading of Japanese, European, and United States legal frameworks, on the distinction between open and proprietary AI models, and on the premium status that human-generated data has acquired in the era of model collapse, the paper asks what translators are actually afraid of, and points toward concrete directions for redistributive design.