Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the gap between abstract AI fairness principles and actionable practices by conducting discourse and thematic analyses of 60 academic, policy, and practitioner sources. The authors derive a structured set of AI fairness practices organized in a matrix spanning the AI lifecycle, categorized by obligation degree and organizational role. The resulting matrix offers role-specific guidance to support the implementation and sustainment of AI fairness in organizations.
AI fairness initiatives often fail because they're stuck in abstract ethics, but this work delivers a practical, role-based matrix to finally make fairness actionable across the entire AI lifecycle.
Because artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly mediates organizational work, fairness has become a critical governance challenge. Existing frameworks often prioritize abstract ethical principles rather than fairness-specific ones and lack actionable guidance across the entire AI lifecycle. This study addresses the principles-to-practice gap in AI fairness governance. We develop actionable AI fairness practices and draw on a socio-technical and praxiological lens, conducting discourse and thematic analyses of 60 academic, policy, and practitioner sources. From these analyses, we derive a structured set of AI fairness practices in a comprehensive, AI lifecycle-spanning matrix organized by obligation degree and organizational role. The matrix provides dynamic, role-specific guidance to support implementation and sustainment of AI fairness. By extending the AI fairness beyond abstract principles to operationalized, actionable practices, we contribute to IS scholarship and offer a modular governance scaffold.