Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the challenges and opportunities of using RISC-V in safety-critical automotive systems, focusing on the certification process required by standards like ISO 26262. It identifies key RISC-V architectural challenges related to functional safety, such as lockstep execution and mixed-criticality isolation. The authors propose an analytical framework and research roadmap centered on optimizing certification economics, and explore the potential of ML methods like LLMs and GNNs to automate and improve various aspects of the certification workflow.
Forget faster cores, the real win for autonomous vehicles is an ASIL-D-ready certifiable RISC-V platform, and this paper lays out the roadmap.
RISC-V is emerging as a viable platform for automotive-grade embedded computing, with recent ISO 26262 ASIL-D certifications demonstrating readiness for safety-critical deployment in autonomous driving systems. However, functional safety in automotive systems is fundamentally a certification problem rather than a processor problem. The dominant costs arise from diagnostic coverage analysis, toolchain qualification, fault injection campaigns, safety-case generation, and compliance with ISO 26262, ISO 21448 (SOTIF), and ISO/SAE 21434. This paper analyzes the role of RISC-V in automotive functional safety, focusing on ISA openness, formal verifiability, custom extension control, debug transparency, and vendor-independent qualification. We examine autonomous driving safety requirements and map them to RISC-V architectural challenges such as lockstep execution, safety islands, mixed-criticality isolation, and secure debug. Rather than proposing a single algorithmic breakthrough, we present an analytical framework and research roadmap centered on certification economics as the primary optimization objective. We also discuss how selected ML methods, including LLM-assisted FMEDA generation, knowledge-graph-based safety case automation, reinforcement learning for fault injection, and graph neural networks for diagnostic coverage, can support certification workflows. We argue that the strongest outcome is not a faster core, but an ASIL-D-ready certifiable RISC-V platform.