Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper audits three common generative AI applications (unspecified in the abstract) for misrepresentation of Second World War atrocities in Ukraine, focusing on hallucinations and inconsistent moralization. The study highlights the risk of genAI models distorting high-risk historical memories, particularly those surrounding atrocities. The audit reveals vulnerabilities in genAI's handling of these sensitive topics, raising concerns about their potential to contribute to historical misrepresentation and selective moralization.
GenAI's handling of WWII atrocities in Ukraine reveals a troubling susceptibility to historical misrepresentation and inconsistent moralization, raising questions about their role in shaping collective memory.
The rise of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) models poses new possibilities and risks for how the past is remembered by accelerating content production and altering the process of information discovery. The most critical risk is historical misrepresentation, which ranges from the distortion of facts and inaccurate depiction of specific groups to more subtle forms, such as the selective moralization of history. The dangers of misrepresentation of the past are particularly pronounced for high-risk memories, such as memories of past atrocities, which have a strong emotional load and are often instrumentalised by political actors. To understand how substantive this risk is, we empirically investigate how genAI applications deal with high-risk memories of the Second World War atrocities in Ukraine. This case is crucial due to the scope of the atrocities and the intense, often instrumentalised, contestation surrounding their memory. We audit the performance of three common genAI applications for different types of misrepresentation, including hallucinations and inconsistent moralization, and discuss the implications for future memory practices.