Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the ethical implications of using postmortem avatars (PMAs) in grief therapy, specifically within imaginal exercises and as a form of art therapy. It leverages the dual-process model of grief, the theory of continuing bonds, and fictionalism to frame potential therapeutic applications. The authors address five ethical objections, arguing that the clinical context mitigates risks, and emphasize the need for empirical research and governance frameworks.
Grief therapy could be revolutionized by AI simulations of the deceased, but thorny ethical questions demand careful consideration before widespread adoption.
Postmortem avatars (PMAs) -- AI systems that simulate a deceased person by being fine-tuned on data they generated or that was generated about them -- have attracted growing scholarly attention, yet their potential role in clinical settings remains largely unexplored. This paper examines the ethics of deploying PMAs as therapeutic tools in grief therapy. Drawing on the dual-process model of grief, the theory of continuing bonds, and the philosophical framework of fictionalism, we propose two potential therapeutic applications: incorporating PMAs into established imaginal exercises such as the empty chair exercise, and treating the process of PMA creation as an art-therapeutic exercise in its own right. We consider five ethical objections to these applications and argue that none constitute knock-down arguments against therapeutic use, particularly given the risk-mitigating role of the clinical context. We conclude by identifying outstanding governance challenges and calling for empirical research, without which neither the promise nor the dangers of therapeutic PMAs can be adequately assessed.