Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the requirements for safe and accountable GenAI learning companions for women in Afghanistan, where formal education is restricted. Through a remote participatory design study with 20 Afghan women, the research identifies that GenAI is primarily used as a peer, mentor, and career guide to compensate for the lack of learning communities. The study reveals that participatory design and envisioning the future with GenAI positively impacts participants' aspirations, agency, and perceived avenues for learning and employment, leading to design directions focused on safety, context-grounded support, and pedagogically aligned assistance.
GenAI can empower women in restrictive educational contexts, but only if designed with safety-first interactions, context-aware support, and pedagogical principles that foster genuine learning rather than superficial progress.
In gender-restrictive and surveilled contexts, where access to formal education may be restricted for women, pursuing education involves safety and privacy risks. When women are excluded from schools and universities, they often turn to online self-learning and generative AI (GenAI) to pursue their educational and career aspirations. However, we know little about what safe and accountable GenAI support is required in the context of surveillance, household responsibilities, and the absence of learning communities. We present a remote participatory design study with 20 women in Afghanistan, informed by a recruitment survey (n = 140), examining how participants envision GenAI for learning and employability. Participants describe using GenAI less as an information source and more as an always-available peer, mentor, and source of career guidance that helps compensate for the absence of learning communities. At the same time, they emphasize that this companionship is constrained by privacy and surveillance risks, contextually unrealistic and culturally unsafe support, and direct-answer interactions that can undermine learning by creating an illusion of progress. Beyond eliciting requirements, envisioning the future with GenAI through participatory design was positively associated with significant increases in participants' aspirations (p=.01), perceived agency (p=.01), and perceived avenues (p=.03). These outcomes show that accountable and safe GenAI is not only about harm reduction but can also actively enable women to imagine and pursue viable learning and employment futures. Building on this, we translate participants' proposals into accountability-focused design directions that center on safety-first interaction and user control, context-grounded support under constrained resources, and offer pedagogically aligned assistance that supports genuine learning rather than quick answers.