Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel 3D-2D dental superimposition method for human identification, addressing limitations in existing approaches by accurately modeling perspective distortion. The method uses computer vision and optimization to replicate ante-mortem 2D photos with post-mortem 3D dental scans, enabling morphological comparison. Experiments on 20,164 cross-comparisons from 142 samples demonstrate promising results, with mean ranking values of 1.6 and 1.5 for landmark-based and segmentation-based approaches, respectively.
Social media photos combined with 3D dental scans can now automatically identify human remains with surprising accuracy, outperforming traditional dental chart comparisons.
Dental comparison is considered a primary identification method, at the level of fingerprints and DNA profiling. One crucial but time-consuming step of this method is the morphological comparison. One of the main challenges to apply this method is the lack of ante-mortem medical records, specially on scenarios such as migrant death at the border and/or in countries where there is no universal healthcare. The availability of photos on social media where teeth are visible has led many odontologists to consider morphological comparison using them. However, state-of-the-art proposals have significant limitations, including the lack of proper modeling of perspective distortion and the absence of objective approaches that quantify morphological differences. Our proposal involves a 3D (post-mortem scan) - 2D (ante-mortem photos) approach. Using computer vision and optimization techniques, we replicate the ante-mortem image with the 3D model to perform the morphological comparison. Two automatic approaches have been developed: i) using paired landmarks and ii) using a segmentation of the teeth region to estimate camera parameters. Both are capable of obtaining very promising results over 20,164 cross comparisons from 142 samples, obtaining mean ranking values of 1.6 and 1.5, respectively. These results clearly outperform filtering capabilities of automatic dental chart comparison approaches, while providing an automatic, objective and quantitative score of the morphological correspondence, easily to interpret and analyze by visualizing superimposed images.