Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces ECG-Reasoning-Benchmark, a multi-turn evaluation framework with over 6,400 samples, to assess the step-by-step reasoning capabilities of MLLMs in ECG interpretation across 17 diagnoses. Evaluation of SOTA models reveals that they struggle to maintain a complete reasoning chain, achieving only 6% completion rate, due to their inability to ground clinical criteria to visual evidence in the ECG signal. This highlights a critical flaw where MLLMs bypass actual visual interpretation, emphasizing the need for reasoning-centric medical AI.
Despite possessing relevant medical knowledge, current MLLMs fail spectacularly at multi-step ECG reasoning, achieving a mere 6% completion rate due to their inability to link clinical criteria to visual ECG evidence.
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show promising performance in automated electrocardiogram interpretation, it remains unclear whether they genuinely perform actual step-by-step reasoning or just rely on superficial visual cues. To investigate this, we introduce \textbf{ECG-Reasoning-Benchmark}, a novel multi-turn evaluation framework comprising over 6,400 samples to systematically assess step-by-step reasoning across 17 core ECG diagnoses. Our comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals a critical failure in executing multi-step logical deduction. Although models possess the medical knowledge to retrieve clinical criteria for a diagnosis, they exhibit near-zero success rates (6% Completion) in maintaining a complete reasoning chain, primarily failing to ground the corresponding ECG findings to the actual visual evidence in the ECG signal. These results demonstrate that current MLLMs bypass actual visual interpretation, exposing a critical flaw in existing training paradigms and underscoring the necessity for robust, reasoning-centric medical AI. The code and data are available at https://github.com/Jwoo5/ecg-reasoning-benchmark.