Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the training dynamics of single-qubit re-uploading (serial) variational quantum circuits compared to multi-qubit circuits with equivalent encoding budgets. It reveals that while serial circuits can represent the same functions as their multi-qubit counterparts, they suffer from "phase-locking," limiting their first-order training capabilities. The key result shows that serial circuits require significantly more training runs to reach optima, especially for flat-spectrum targets, and can exhibit higher held-out errors.
Single-qubit quantum circuits, despite universal function approximation, get stuck in training due to "phase-locking," requiring orders of magnitude more optimization steps than multi-qubit equivalents.
Angle-encoded variational quantum circuits implement truncated Fourier series. For one-dimensional inputs, a single-qubit re-uploading (serial) circuit represents every function that a multi-qubit circuit with the same encoding budget $E$ can; we find that this exchange of width for depth is not free in first-order training. Because its state lives on the Bloch sphere, all parameters of the serial circuit move the state, at each input, along one complex direction, which we call \emph{phase-locking}. We prove that this costs no Fourier direction but leaves no direction to spare: however many parameters it has, the serial circuit has at most $2E+2$ tangent directions, one more than its $2E+1$ Fourier coefficients need, while a two-qubit control with the same encoding budget and model class generically has at least $6E+6$. The cost in training is measured against this control, as the number of runs out of 100 that reach the optimum within a fixed step budget. On an exact loss with flat-spectrum targets the gap grows with $E$; at $E=32$ the serial circuit converges in 3, 53 and 83 runs under gradient descent, Adam and Levenberg--Marquardt, the control in 99, 100 and 100. On three real-world series, at matched parameter counts, the serial circuit reaches the least-squares optimum in at most 9 runs under Adam and in 32 to 93 under Levenberg--Marquardt, the control in at least 98 and in all 100; its held-out error is up to about $1.5$ times that of the control under Adam, but no larger in the typical run under Levenberg--Marquardt.