Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Standard logical anomaly detectors, while achieving high AUROC on clean data, degrade significantly under common capture shifts like brightness changes and zoom-out. This paper introduces a novel framework that trains a classifier on both normal images and synthetically generated anomalies, bypassing direct comparison to normal exemplars. The proposed method demonstrates robust performance, achieving competitive AUROC on clean data and significantly outperforming reference methods under heterogeneous perturbations.
Most industrial anomaly detectors collapse under simple brightness or zoom changes, losing up to 34 AUROC points, but a new approach using synthetic anomalies maintains over 92% AUROC.
Detectors of logical anomalies, such as missing, extra or wrongly combined parts, usually score a test image by its distance from normal (good) images. They achieve near-perfect image-level AUROC on standard industrial anomaly detection benchmarks such as MVTec LOCO, but their robustness to changes in capture conditions remains largely unexamined. Under a heterogeneous perturbation protocol in which each test image is randomly kept unaltered or subjected to a brightness reduction or a zoom-out transformation, the normal-reference methods we tested lose 9.7 to 34.1 AUROC points, and two of the strongest, CSAD and SALAD, fall from 97.7% and 96.4% to 68.1% and 62.3%. We propose a framework in which a classifier, trained on normal images and on synthetic anomalies, scores a test image without comparing it with normal data. From a short description of each product, a language model derives anomaly types and editing instructions, an image editor applies them to normal images, and the classifier learns to separate the edited images from automatically discovered normal sub-modes. With its full training recipe, the framework reaches 94.9% AUROC on clean images, 1.5 to 2.8 points below SALAD and CSAD, and 94.1% under the perturbation protocol. Trained without brightness or zoom-out augmentation, so that neither test perturbation occurs in training, it still reaches 92.5% (93.2% clean). These results suggest that clean benchmark scores can hide a strong sensitivity to capture conditions, and that learning the decision from both normal images and rule violations may reduce it.