Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
GeZo-SAC addresses overestimation bias in off-policy actor-critic methods by introducing auxiliary geometric representations (zonotopes) to adapt critic pessimism dynamically to state-action disagreement. This approach uses the geometric width of the zonotope to modulate pessimism and a disagreement measure to control critic aggregation via log-sum-exp, moving towards a minimum as disagreement grows. Across four MuJoCo locomotion benchmarks, GeZo-SAC achieves state-of-the-art performance on Ant-v5 and Hopper-v5 with reduced actuator work and action effort, while maintaining near-zero overestimation.
Dynamic critic pessimism, guided by geometric disagreement, unlocks superior locomotion learning and efficiency in off-policy actor-critic methods.
Off-policy actor--critic methods control overestimation bias by taking the minimum of two critics. This uses the same aggregation rule everywhere, regardless of how the critics disagree. We propose \textbf{GeZo-SAC}, which uses auxiliary geometric representations to adapt critic pessimism to the state and action. Alongside its scalar value, each critic predicts a set of generators defining a zonotope. Probing this zonotope along sampled directions provides a geometric width,"subtracted from each critic value as a pessimistic offset, and a measure of disagreement between the two critics, aggregated with log-sum-exp. This disagreement controls how the critics are combined, moving from a width-weighted average toward the usual minimum as disagreement increases. At inference, the deployed policy is an unmodified SAC actor, since the generators are used only on the critic side during training.Across four MuJoCo-v5 locomotion benchmarks and six off-policy baselines, GeZo-SAC achieves the highest mean return on Ant-v5 and Hopper-v5 and remains competitive with other methods on the remaining tasks. Our analysis further shows that GeZo-SAC achieves the lowest average actuator work and action effort per metre among the evaluated methods, while maintaining near-zero measured overestimation frequency across all four environments.