Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the feasibility and requirements of forget-only machine unlearning, where deletion is performed solely on a trained model and target examples without access to retained data. The authors demonstrate that the possibility and accuracy of forget-only unlearning are contingent on the learning algorithm and dataset, deriving lower bounds on unlearning fidelity for standard methods. Crucially, they establish that successful forget-only unlearning necessitates memorizing significant portions of the training data, potentially exceeding the information retained by standard training.
Forget-only unlearning demands models memorize far more than standard training, challenging the premise of efficient deletion.
Machine unlearning asks for a deletion algorithm whose output is close to retraining from scratch without the selected forget examples. In this work, we study forget-only unlearning, where the deletion algorithm receives only the trained model and the examples to forget, with no retained data or extra training information. We ask whether forget-only unlearning is always possible. We first show that this depends on the learning method: different datasets can produce the same trained model but require very different outputs after the same examples are removed. Using this observation, we derive lower bounds on how accurately unlearning can match retraining and instantiate them for several standard learning algorithms. We then ask what must be true when forget-only unlearning succeeds. To this end, we derive lower bounds on what an algorithm must memorize about the training data to handle arbitrary deletion requests. For simple threshold learners, the required information can be as large as the entire dataset, even though ordinary training keeps only one boundary point. Overall, our results show that information discarded during ordinary learning may be needed later for deletion, so models designed for forget-only unlearning may need to retain more information than standard training does.