Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SOTA, an agentic framework for structured stock option trading that addresses the complexity of the vast option universe by abstracting decisions to the strategy level. SOTA leverages a post-trained Qwen3.8-27B model, first with supervised fine-tuning and then reinforcement learning, to select optimal option strategies. Evaluated on nine large-cap U.S. equities and SPY, SOTA achieved an 18.3% total return and a Sharpe ratio of 1.60 over a six-month out-of-sample period, outperforming existing methods.
An LLM-based agent achieves 18.3% out-of-sample returns in stock options trading by learning to select structured strategies, but surprisingly, retaining news during RL training halves performance.
As option markets grow and AI advances, agentic systems for option trading are gaining increasing attention. Language-model-based agents can reason over contextual information such as news, but option trading presents a particularly challenging decision problem: a single stock can have thousands of contracts, and the agent must decide both which contracts to trade and how to combine them. Existing approaches often sidestep this complexity by restricting the policy to a fixed strategy structure, such as a straddle, limiting their ability to switch strategies as market conditions change. We present SOTA (Stock Options Trading Agents), an agentic trading framework for structured option-strategy selection. SOTA abstracts the large option universe into strategy-level decisions while deterministic resolvers handle portfolio implementation. We develop SOTA by post-training Qwen3.8-27B with supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning. SOTA is evaluated on options on nine large-cap U.S. equities and SPY against rule-based and machine-learning strategy selectors in the same trading environment. Over a six-month out-of-sample period, SOTA earns an 18.3% total return with a Sharpe ratio of 1.60 and a maximum drawdown of 8.96%. We also document an asymmetric role of news: news improves frontier-teacher trajectories, but retaining news during reinforcement learning reduces out-of-sample return from 18.3% to -2.7%.