Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates how post-generation assembly of fixed-length, differentially private synthetic time-series windows impacts downstream forecasting utility. By systematically varying overlap rates and window-weighting schemes, the study reveals that optimal assembly strategies are forecaster-dependent, with no single approach universally improving boundary continuity or individual fidelity diagnostics while reducing forecasting error. The key result is that optimal assembly configurations are jointly determined by the forecaster, overlap rate, and weighting scheme, necessitating a tailored approach for each forecasting model.
Differentially private synthetic time-series forecasting utility hinges on forecaster-specific window assembly, not just generator quality.
Differentially private time-series generators commonly produce fixed-length synthetic windows, whereas downstream forecasting models often require long continuous training sequences. How these windows are assembled after generation can therefore alter the effective synthetic data presented to a forecaster, even when the trained generator remains unchanged. We study this post-generation sequence assembly process by systematically varying overlap rates and window-weighting schemes and evaluating the resulting sequences in terms of boundary continuity, statistical and temporal fidelity, and Train-on-Synthetic-Test-on-Real (TSTR) forecasting utility. Across four types of public datasets (ETTh1, ETTm1, Weather, and Appliances) and five forecasting models, the results reveal a clear forecaster-dependent assembly principle: downstream TSTR utility is jointly shaped by the forecaster, overlap rate, and window-weighting scheme, leading to distinct assembly preferences across forecasting models. Increased overlap generally improves boundary continuity, but improvements in continuity or individual fidelity diagnostics do not consistently reduce forecasting error, indicating that these diagnostics alone are insufficient for selecting assembly configurations. Complete five-forecaster assembly grids, together with matched Train-on-Real-Test-on-Real (TRTR) references, further characterize these regularities and quantify assembly-dependent utility relative to real-data training. We then validate the identified principles through additional analyses of robustness and generator variability.