Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This review surveys the burgeoning application of AI and ML across the entire ARPES workflow, from sample preparation to theoretical comparison, addressing a critical gap in comprehensive understanding for experimentalists. It details existing ML applications, their strengths, weaknesses, and future potential, while also highlighting the limitations of current ARPES data repositories compared to larger scientific datasets. The authors advocate for community efforts in sharing pretrained models and developing a standardized, larger open ARPES dataset to accelerate progress towards fully autonomous ARPES laboratories.
AI is poised to revolutionize ARPES, moving beyond data analysis to enable fully autonomous, self-driving experimental labs.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an increasingly useful tool across the experimental sciences, including angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), which routinely produces large, multidimensional datasets of electronic structure. Recent advances in AI and machine learning (ML) have opened new opportunities across the entire ARPES workflow, from automated sample preparation and real-time data acquisition to post-experiment data analysis and comparison with theoretical calculations. Despite this progress, a comprehensive review of ML applications, their capabilities, and reliability across the different stages of ARPES workflow is still lacking. In this review, we first introduce ML methods that are most relevant to experimentalists working in condensed matter physics and materials science. We then follow the ARPES workflow, reviewing existing ML applications at each step and discussing their advantages, limitations and potential for future development. We also examine the current ARPES data landscape, where several open databases are available but remain relatively small and fragmented compared with large, shared datasets such as ImageNet. Given these limitations, we suggest that the community focus on sharing pretrained models that can be further trained, adapted to specific tasks, and redistributed, while working toward a larger and standardized open ARPES dataset repository. Finally, we discuss our perspectives on the future of AI within the ARPES workflow using a six-level framework of laboratory automation, highlighting the opportunities and challenges in moving toward a fully autonomous, self-driving ARPES laboratory.